Benefits Buzz: April 2020

U.S. Supreme Court Will Hear Challenge to ACA

 

No Statute of Limitations Applies for ACA Pay or Play Penalties

 

COVID 19 Resources and Updates

 

U.S. Supreme Court Will Hear Challenge to ACA
The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to hear a legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The case involved is Texas v. Azar, a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the ACA’s individual mandate.

ACA Litigation
Texas v. Azar was filed in 2018 by 18 states after the individual mandate penalty was eliminated. In December 2019, a federal appeals court ruled in the case that the individual mandate is unconstitutional and directed the lower court to determine whether the rest of the ACA can remain in place. The Supreme Court had previously denied a request to expedite consideration of this case. This is the third time the Supreme Court has reviewed the ACA’s constitutionality.

Employer Action Steps
While this legal challenge is pending, all existing ACA provisions will continue to be applicable and enforced. This challenge does not impact Exchange enrollment, the ACA’s employer shared responsibility penalties and related reporting requirements, or any other applicable ACA requirements.

top

 
 

No Statute of Limitations Applies for ACA Pay or Play Penalties

The IRS Office of Chief Counsel recently released a memorandum clarifying that there is no applicable statute of limitations on pay or play penalty assessments under the ACA. This means that there is no time limit for the IRS to issue a penalty assessment for employers that do not comply with the pay or play rules for a given year.

What are the pay or play rules?
The ACA’s employer shared responsibility rules require applicable large employers (ALEs) to offer affordable, minimum value health coverage to their full-time employees or pay a penalty. These rules, also known as the “employer mandate” or “pay or play” rules, impose penalties on ALEs if one or more of their full-time employees obtain an Exchange subsidy (either because the ALE does not offer health coverage, or offers coverage that is unaffordable or does not provide minimum value).

Pay or play penalties are subject to IRS lien and levy enforcement actions. Interest will accrue from the date of the notice and demand, and continue until the ALE pays the total penalty balance due.

Employer Action Steps
Because no statute of limitations applies, the IRS can assess pay or play penalties for an ALE’s noncompliance many years after the violation occurred. As a result, ALEs will want to be sure that they are complying with these rules for each applicable year.

top

 
 

COVID 19 UPDATES
Please visit our COVID – 19 HUB for more information regarding COVID – 19

[table id=20 /]

©2020 Zywave, Inc. All rights reserved.
The information provided in this alert is not, is not intended to be, and shall not be construed to be, either the provision of legal advice or an offer to provide legal services, nor does it necessarily reflect the opinions of the HealthSure, our lawyers or our clients. This is not legal advice. No client-lawyer relationship between you and our lawyers is or may be created by your use of this information. Rather, the content is intended as a general overview of the subject matter covered. HealthSure and Marathas Barrow Weatherhead Lent LLP are not obligated to provide updates on the information presented herein. Those reading this alert are encouraged to seek direct counsel on legal questions.
CHIC Logo

Take the Community Hospital Insurance Coalition (CHIC) for example. With our expert support and management, more than 30 rural hospitals who have come together to own this medical stop-loss reinsurance company. They are paying less for their insurance, improving benefits program performance, and receiving their share of a significant annual surplus cash distribution (~$2.5 million since inception in 2018).